И еще чуть чуть. Пару выдержек из ревью об CD-player Classe Audio:
In a world moving (slowly) towards CD, DVD-A, and SACD universal players, why build a player that only handles CDs? Several reasons. One is that not everyone is interested in DVD-A and SACD. CD is still a very good format, and 99.999% of the music out there is on CD.
Далее:
What surprised me most, was that the CDP-10 had more detail than even SACDs played on a mass market unit. I had really expected to find that SACD would sound better than CD, regardless of the players. But no, the CDP-10 had more substance. The leading edge of sounds was significantly clearer with the CDP-10. And, even though the CDP-10 had more detail, the mass market SACD player had more harshness. We are talking about two different things here though, and it is probable that the quality of the support circuitry, including op-amps at the output stage, are responsible for the sound differences.
Полностью статья на:
Так что как раз дело не в микрухах совсем, о чем и говорилось здесь не раз.
In a world moving (slowly) towards CD, DVD-A, and SACD universal players, why build a player that only handles CDs? Several reasons. One is that not everyone is interested in DVD-A and SACD. CD is still a very good format, and 99.999% of the music out there is on CD.
Далее:
What surprised me most, was that the CDP-10 had more detail than even SACDs played on a mass market unit. I had really expected to find that SACD would sound better than CD, regardless of the players. But no, the CDP-10 had more substance. The leading edge of sounds was significantly clearer with the CDP-10. And, even though the CDP-10 had more detail, the mass market SACD player had more harshness. We are talking about two different things here though, and it is probable that the quality of the support circuitry, including op-amps at the output stage, are responsible for the sound differences.
Полностью статья на:
Так что как раз дело не в микрухах совсем, о чем и говорилось здесь не раз.
)