Да, очень интересная дискуссия, особенно в части прозрачности и искажений. Но, господа, хотелось бы напомнить смысл вопроса: СКАНДИНАВЫ или АНГЛИЧАНЕ? Что же выбрать из них и какую марку аппарата?
интересного немного. Опять некратный асинхронный апсамплинг выдаётся за птичье молоко. А вот за такие фразы:
"As a result each data 'word' has approximately five times the amount of information or detail and therefore results in much greater accuracy than a normal CD player relying on conventional technology."
и особенно вот это:
"Conventional logic would dictate that if data were sampled five times faster, then the resulting sound will be five times faster with a much higher corresponding pitch. This would only be true if the input to the up-sampler were in sync (or synchronous) with the output from the up-sampler. In the application of this technology in the Thunder 3.1 there is a massive memory buffer in the middle which allows for the input and output to be asynchronous - ie. not in sync with each other. Therefore as a result what goes in in terms of speed and pitch comes out the same!"