Выбор транспорта

Вы это кому ?
А здесь читали ?
http://www.osp.ru/pcworld/2003/11/166916/_p2.html
а я о чем толкую ?

Если EAC включает коррекцию ошибок - о точной копии можно забыть, но включает он её либо если диск поцарапан, или изначально был сделан с хреновой матрицы.

Вы определитесь для себя, что такое 100%? Точная побитная копия, или где то - примерно, очень близко  похоже на оригинал.

А что бы больше не терзаться сомнениями, поиском информации, спорами, купите большой шпиндель CD-R, и записывайте последовательно с одной на другую болванку свой любимый аудиофильский альбомчик. Если жалко денег, можно обойтись парой RW. Вот теперь от качества привода, софта, CD-R и зависит с какой по счету перезаписи Вы перестанете узнавать музыку.

цитата с http://www.avguide.com/review/esoteric-p-03-universal-disc-transport-and-d-03-digital-analog-converter

"I was working in a CD mastering lab (where we transferred CD mastertapes to disc on a million-dollar laser mastering machine in a clean room), and part of my job involved trouble-shooting odd technical problems relating to mastertapes and replicated discs. A client for whom we had made discs was unhappy with the results, reporting that the discs didn’t sound as good as the mastertape. I compared the data on the mastertape with the data recovered from the replicated disc (using a CD-ROM pre-mastering system) and found, not surprisingly, that the disc and tape were bit-for-bit identical. The extremely talented electrical and optical engineers I worked with (who had designed and built the mastering machine) dismissed the artist’s claim, saying: “Bits is bits.” Unfortunately, I was unable to compare the sound of the disc with the mastertape through the same digital-to-analog converters (this was back in the day when mastertapes were on ¾" U-Matic tape decoded by a Sony PCM 1610 or 1630).
Partly out of my own curiosity and partly out of the desire to please the client, we cut another master disc and replicated new discs—this time on a different mastering machine. The client reported that the new disc sounded as he intended, and went away happy. But I was left with the question of how two CDs, each containing identical data, could sound different. But now I was armed with two discs that could be played back on a high-resolution system, and my own listening confirmed that the second disc did sound better than the first. (A similar paradox, which arose many years later, is that a CD-R made from a CD often sounds better than the original CD.)
The next step was to look at the physical differences between the two discs—discs with identical ones and zeros but with different sound. An analysis of the pit and land lengths on the two discs showed that the inferior-sounding disc had greater variations in those pit and land lengths—in other words, jitter was encoded in the disc’s physical structures."

даже если вы точно скопируете сд на хард, у вас возникает другая проблема - как без джиттера произвести цифро-аналоговое преобразование.
а связь денона с Харли я так и не уследил.

PS Audio’s ground breaking PerfectWave Transport (PWT) Memory Player stands alone as the ultimate optical disc player ever made. Built from the ground up as a dedicated high-end CD and DVD audio transport, the PWT will read almost any optical disc and output near-perfect digital data to any D to A processor made. The PWT is designed to be the last optical disc player you will ever need. Future-proof and field upgradable, the PWT can read high resolution WAV files or standard resolution CD audio files directly and feed the perfected data to your DAC through standard AESEBU, SPDIF or PS Audio’s exclusive I2S through HDMI connection for unprecedented performance.-бРЕД?